תביעת ענק נגד עובדי הסעד אברי סוטון ,ליאת שפירא ,וגורמי שיפוט אשר פוגעים בהורים וילדים .

מדובר בפשעים נגד האנושות שעד היום לא זכו למענה ראוי מאחר ובישראל יש דיקטטורה משפטית ,הפלייתית ,תוך אלימות, פיזית נפשית נגד כול מי שמבקש צדק עפ"י חוק רק מחוץ לישראל .

האבות בישראל אוכלים מהפחים וגרים ברחובות והדבר הזה לא מעניין את מחוללי הפשיעה .

מסירות  משפטיות שבוצעו לידי הנתבעות מתברר שהם לא יודעות לקרוא אנגלית בסיסית .

United States District Court

Eastern District of Texas, Plano Division

________________________________________

Jacob ben Issachar,

Plaintiff, complaint

Against,

Sonnit Forer, Naftali Shilo, Nefesh Ba Nefesh,

Gali Ron, Gideon Sa'ar, Liat Shapira, Avery Sutton. Dikla Klein

Esther Hayut and Ruth Halperin Kadri, Yaniv Oshri, Liran Hachmi, Livnat Melamed.

Livna Abadi. Barak Laser.

Accused.

_______________________________________

The plaintiff, for his complaint, alleges and alleges as follows:

Initial statement

1. This claim stems from a malicious extortion ring in Israel that targets Israeli men married to Israeli women and extorts them with the aim of robbing them of any property and using parental alienation as a secondary extortion tool.

The claim amount is $8,576,000 in compensatory damages, $6,000,000 in punitive damages for a total of $14,576,000.

2. This extortion ring uses interstate and international wires through US PO boxes to notify the men of a hearing scheduled in Israel requiring a personal appearance. If the man does not travel to Israel, a default judgment will be entered for any bogus and fictitious financial claim the woman files (and it is worded to that the woman can request reciprocity and enforce it in the US), and if the man takes the risk and travels to Israel, the woman can immediately issue a restraining order that prevents him from returning to his home overseas and basically using his body as collateral for any invented and fictitious claim.
3. Although the members of the extortion ring are members of the Israeli judiciary or government, that "judicial authority" is not entitled to any immunity or "state action" recognition of sovereignty, because the courts they operate do not resemble anything even remotely visible. Like an adversarial court with fair justice and equal protection. On the contrary, the tools used are pure extortion and they are done with the malicious intent to discriminate against men, inspired by the agenda of radical feminism and degrading male hatred. And this is genocide
4. The plaintiff and many other foreign men who were found similarly was and still is the victim of such shocking blackmail, according to which his ex-wife filed a fake claim for child support until the year 2037. Without any evidence or basis or contract and based on her words alone, he was imprisoned in Israel for 18 years. He saw all my life. A dog in Israel without the ability to make a living.
5. The plaintiff lives on the street (homeless). The plaintiff is disabled and his disability is taken by the defendants.
6. The claimant is the winner of the 2008 Human Rights Award.
7. Plaintiff's complaint is based on 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) which provides a private cause of action for RICO to an injured individual where the conduct of an enterprise creates a pattern of racketeering activity that is the proximate cause of the individual's injury.
8. The defendants' misrepresentation was intentional and deliberate. As such, the defendant's behavior constitutes behavior to promote an enterprise through repeated actions of mail fraud, network fraud and intentional deception.
9. The plaintiff Jacob Ben Issachar is a native of Israel, he is 52 years old and the father of 3 children who are in Israel. His business deals with the trading of old, expired, mutilated and non-current banknotes and coins. In 2007 he immigrated to Israel and in 2020 his wife started divorcing him and thus the plaintiff fell victim to the blackmailers of the feminists working in Israel. Plaintiff owns assets in Texas, either by himself or with associates, that are subject to litigation against the United States Mint. Plaintiff's address is 405 Club House Dr., Allen, TX 75002. Tel.
10. The defendant Sanonit Forer is a citizen and resident of Israel. She is a judge in the family court in Tel Aviv. This defendant holds an extreme feminist idea. She is a man who harbors hatred against men and discriminates against them only because of their sex, and she is the main extortionist who has blackmailed the plaintiff since May 1998 to demonstrate for a year until the year 2037), to give up giving up contact with his children, and all this was done with the intention of domesticating her sums as a judgment and seizing her property The plaintiff anywhere in the world whose address is 1 Weizman St. Tel Aviv Israel.
11. The accused Naftali Shilo is a citizen and resident of Israel. He is a judge in the District Court in Tel Aviv sitting in family appeals. This defendant holds a feminist idea to the extreme. It incites hatred of men against men and discriminates against them only because of their sex, and it aids and abets the blackmailing of men. He was sued a few years ago by a Jewish father from California, Mr. Eitan Eliyahu, blackmailing his sister and mother into giving up their apartments so that his wife, also a resident of California, accepts them based on fictitious claims she made up. Case No. 14-cv-01636-BLF, US Dist.Cr, Northern Dist in San Jose, California. Sheila's address is Hagafen St. 562, Efrata, West Bank, Israel 9044613. Tel. +972-2-9933743.
12. The defendant Nefesh Benefesh is a non-profit organization licensed and subcontracted by the State of Israel to promote immigration to Israel by Jews from all over the English-speaking world. They operate in Texas under the auspices of the Jewish Federation of Texas. They entice Jewish men to immigrate to Israel without telling them that in their country they are considered second-class citizens (if not worse), they have no rights for their children, all their property and savings given to women under false claims can be confiscated, they may be subjected to blackmail and may not be allowed to return to their homeland for many years unless they pay a ransom of tens of thousands of dollars or even hundreds of thousands of dollars. This defendant operates out of the Jewish Community Center of Dallas where they hold "nefesh pre-immigration planning workshops". Their address is Jewish Community Center Dallas 7900 Northaven Road Dallas, Texas. Defendant Nefesh BaNefesh acted in conspiracy with defendants in violation of 18 US Code § 1349.
13. The defendant Gali Ron is a citizen and resident of Israel who works in the court and her job is to prevent fathers from getting an exemption from payment due to financial situation.
14. The accused Gali Ron, because she prevents access to the court and prevents a fee exemption due to a feminist agenda and genocide against men, she sends the plaintiff to steal. Because of this there is no connection between the plaintiff and his son.
15. The accused Livna Abadi is a citizen of Israel who lives at 35 Bialik St. Ramat Gan.
16. A serial sperm thief is active in women's organizations that harm men. And holds extreme views together with the defendant Ruth Kadari. The defendant is motivated by parental alienation to establish a relationship between the plaintiff and his son and established a bakery together with the defendants.

Dee murdered the plaintiff's soul towards his son and claims that he is mentally ill.

18. The accused is waiting for the plaintiff from his son's life.
19. The accused Gideon Sa'ar is a citizen and resident of Israel. He served as the Minister of Justice in Israel. He is also a firm believer in the theories of radical feminism and during his tenure he promoted anti-male legislation that would make the lives of men in divorce proceedings hell on earth. As a feminist, he opposed any attempt to delete the shameful laws in the law that outright discriminate against men. His address: 29 Zalach A-Din St., Jerusalem Israel.
20. The accused Esther Hayut is a citizen and resident of Israel. She is the chief judge of the Supreme Court of Israel and a fanatical follower of the radical feminism cult. Under her leadership and guidance every man in Israel who enters into a divorce. The procedure is treated like dirt, with the aim of destroying him, destroying him, impoverishing him, transferring his property to women, keeping him away from his children and driving him to death or suicide. Her address is 23 Yonatan St., Tzahala, Tel Aviv.
21. The defendant Ruth Halperin Kadri is a citizen and resident of Israel, she heads an organization called the "Reckman Center for Women", which solicits donations in every country of the 50 US states and in Israel is the number 1 source for the distribution of hate articles and proposed laws that reek of hatred of men and inspired by Nazi propaganda Der Stirmer against Jews, only nowadays it targets male Jews and wishes for their death and destruction. Its influence on the Israeli parliament is so powerful that every one of the 120 members of the Knesset is afraid of it and unleashes its propaganda tools against it. The defendant Halperin Kadri acted in collusion with defendants in violation of § 18 of the American Code 1349. Kadri's address is American Friends of Bar Ilan, 60 East 56th Street, New York, New York 10022, Tel. 1-212-906-3900.
22. Livnat Melamed works as an attorney at the Ministry of Justice in Israel, sewing false cases in courts, forging documents to put men in prison and prevent them from seeing their children, Attorney Melamed ordered the arrest of the plaintiff along with the defendants. Yaniv Oshri and Liran Hachmi in order to harm his freedom and even asked to shut his mouth in violation of Article 20 of the American Constitution (Freedom of Speech) The accused teaches a dangerous woman who has opinions of hatred of men and committed genocide against them. Her address is Hernerita Sold 1 Tel Aviv.
23. The defendant Liran Hachmi is a member of the Gestapo in Israel, works in the Israel Police and acted to harm the plaintiff by false arrest while forging documents and the plaintiff was detained in violation of freedom of liberty. The defendant acted to harm the plaintiff and also caused his arrest.. Liran Hachmi used to abuse black children and continues to do so! His address is Derech Haim Bar Lev 100 Tel Aviv.
24. The accused Yaniv Usheri, a member of the Gestapo in Israel, arrests Israeli men and prevents them from seeing their children while using violence and abusing them, and he ordered the plaintiff to be harmed and arrested in order to harm his freedom.

The defendant wanted to silence the plaintiff from criticizing the defendant Sannit Forer and made sure to exercise his influence in court. His address is Derech Haim Bar Lev 100 Tel Aviv.

25. The accused Avery Sutton is a lawyer who commits genocide of fathers and prevents any contact between the plaintiff through fraud and deception while preventing a 14-year contact between the plaintiff and his son.
26. The accused is in favor of drug use and parental alienation of men and runs a mafia with apartheid organizations. His address is 35 Bialik St. Ramat Gan
27. The accused Liat Shapira is the head of the Gestapo, kidnaps children from their parents and claims that the plaintiff has no rights over his son and her approach is genocide. The accused abducts thousands of children from families and acts against the plaintiff by preventing contact with his son. She even states that drug use and incitement against the plaintiff is indicated for a minor. This is not the only case that the accused Shapira kidnaps children. Her address is Bialik 35 Ramat Gan.
28. The accused Barak Lazer commits genocide against fathers, he represents a mafia of discriminatory judicial officials in a fourth world country.
29. The accused is concerned about harming rape and it is a sexual injury and is even concerned about publishing it in violation of international conventions
30. The defendant asks his fellow judges to arrest the plaintiff so that he does not sue them.
31. Thanks to his activity, the plaintiff was arrested without any reason. The defendant commits genocide against the fathers.
32. The accused Dikla Klein commits genocide against the plaintiff, gives a hand to mental and financial abuse against the plaintiff and left him destitute. She behaves worse than the Nazis. Her address is Weizman 1 Tel Aviv.
33. Jurisdiction and venue.
34. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1331, because it presents a federal question under the FLSA (29 U.S.C. § 206), RICO (18 U.S.C. §1962), and Mail and Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. §§1341, 1343). This Court also has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' common law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. In addition, the Court has jurisdiction over Plaintiff's FLSA claim pursuant to 29 U.S.C. Section 216 (b). Also, for crimes against humanity (discrimination on the basis of sex against Hughes Kogans and the laws of all nations. This action is brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the first and the fourteenth.
35. This court has personal jurisdiction over the defendants because the defendants operate businesses in the state of Texas.
36. Venue is proper in the District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). The defendants directed their actions and calculated their scheme of extortion against the defendant's property in Portland, Texas.

Facts and background

Legal discriminatory laws in Israel

37. In the last 25 years, the ideology of radical feminism has taken over the State of Israel, and all branches of government, state authorities and the judicial system have to passionately and vigorously implement the holy scriptures of the feminism sect.
38. The laws explicitly discriminate in favor of women. They received automatic custody of the children (the only country in the world where the tender was not canceled years of custody), and they are exempt from paying and/or participating in child support, which means that even if they are not the parental guardians, they can still collect child support, and even if they are richer From the man significantly, he still has to pay the woman no matter what.
39. Unlike other countries where the calculation of child support is based on income, and is suspended or canceled in case of physical disability or unemployment, in Israel child support collections do not stop. It also never stops even if the father has new children with anyone Otherwise, these children are aborted and condemned to poverty.
40. The amounts awarded under the heading child support are not similar to what is considered child support elsewhere. It starts with a mandatory minimum of 1,600 NIS ($460) per child, plus $30-50% of the wife's rent and all housing maintenance, plus 50% of the nursery (can be $350 for toddlers), 50% extracurricular and after-school
41. Lesson activities, 50% private tutors, 50% dentistry, and even compensation for the time a mother spends with her children as a custodial mother ("care fees").
42. It is easy to determine the provision of alimony called "child alimony" at 80% of the actual income, 100% of the income and even 200%-300% of the income.

These draconian awards place Israel at the top of the international chart (OECD) in child support grants, 3 to 4 times the average amount in the US and Europe, even though the average salaries in Israel are half of the salaries in the US and Western Europe.

43. Women also enjoy immunity from prosecution for false violence and rape complaints to the police, and this actually encourages almost every woman to enter Israel to start the divorce at the police station and not in the courts.
44. All the accompanying professionals such as government social workers, police officers, relief workers, private experts, a psychologist who performs "parental fitness" exams for men were all trained in ultra-radical feminist organizations such as the Rakman Center, Witso and Naamat.
45. As early as November 2011, the UN Committee on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights condemned Israel for not amending the laws that must comply with international standards and norms, including the demand to cancel the preference for custody of women, lower the alimony rates so that they match income and time with the children, and take Steps to reduce the number of men committing suicide during divorce proceedings, which were 300 then and 450 today.
46. The same committee met again in October 2019 and warned Israel for not taking any legal steps to change the hostile legal environment for men, and not passing a law, in accordance with the obligations under the UN treaties that guarantee equality between men and women.
47. Israeli men submitted petition after petition to the Supreme Court (currently chaired by the defendant Hayut) to cancel the discrimination against men and all of them failed and were rejected on the same day they were submitted. Judge Edna Arbel justified one such rejection by saying that women have been oppressed for generations, and now is the time for affirmative action in favor of women. The same A. a free ticket is essential for all judges in Israel to literally rob men of their property and children.

The squeeze ring is aimed at men

48. Foreign men, Americans, Australians and others married to Israeli women are especially vulnerable to the extortion tool of non-exit orders. This is an injunction easily available to women to order these men's ability to leave the country of Israel, return to his original family and return to a society where they can earn a living, because in Israel their lives become hell on earth very quickly: all their assets and savings are immediately encumbered, they are thrown out of their homes (in many cases to the street), their credit cards and bank accounts are blocked, and many of them are only allowed to see the children once a week for one hour under heavy guard at a security facility called a "contact center" or contact center. If because the plaintiff cuts off 14 years due to genocide and being Mizrahi.

These non-departure orders actually seize the foreign father's body as collateral for the payment of child support obligations until the age of 21. This is a form of modern servitude, as the state holds a person's body as collateral, and meanwhile he is condemned to live a dog's life in poverty and destitution.

In order to be able to evacuate these ex parte, exit orders are not required. The men must issue a bond of several years in advance (with a value of between two and five years of child support. This bond is actually a ransom in extortion to obtain the man's physical freedom. In the plaintiff's case, The defendant is paid and corrected the guarantee.

49. It is important to note that this heavy guarantee comes in addition to the imposition of foreclosures on which a unique extortion and extortion ring has developed in Israel.
50. Men who are in Israel cannot leave unless they surrender and sign over everything they own to their wives and men who are overseas are threatened by the judges and judges that if they do not come to Israel to participate in the hearings in person, in default a judgment will be given for failure to appear giving the women, all assets and veto rights Regarding access to the children, extortionate amounts of child support and exclusive rights to make decisions about the children's medical and educational needs.
51. These men know that in any case they lose because of the risk of going to Israel for what seems like a one-day testimony will mean that upon arrival a no-exit order will be issued, and it will take months or years just to litigate the process of evacuating the no-exit. In the meantime, this foreign father has no home, no ability to make a living, and he must spend tens of thousands of dollars on lawyers to litigate the "no" deportation.
52. Who in their right mind would risk such a life-threatening decision and take it by flight without knowing if they would ever be allowed to leave the land of the Jews at all, or alive?
53. Such demands to appear in person in Israel are often sent by the defendants to the plaintiff overseas through mail and line channels such as emails crossing international borders.

The plaintiff's circumstances

54. The plaintiff met an Israeli woman, who stole his sperm and took the child for herself.
55. The wife, Mrs. Livna Abadi, filed a demand to impose a lien on the plaintiff, while the defendant refrains from allowing the plaintiff to see his son. Any "normal" court where extortion is not the norm, no judge in his right mind would ask for more bonds to ensure free exits and entries into the country, especially when the values are for the purpose of participating in experiments.
56. The defendant Senonit Forer announced that children from sperm donation are better and even prevents contact between the plaintiff and his son and filed a false complaint with the Israel Police. The defendant Sanonit Forer uses attorney's fees in favor of women to achieve 2 goals: so the woman can use it at the court to issue a restraining order and levies and other encumbrances, as well as to scare the man from submitting any applications to this judge.

Also, the defendant Sannit Forer refused to set dates for conferences and the trial in connection with seeing the minor who is a rebellious child.

Proved that in Israel's judicial extortion trap, no one has a chance of even reaching a trial for his complaints and counterclaims, because the extorting judge (in this case the accused Ofek) can simply put the complaint dormant indefinitely. There are no drugs, no outlets and no way around the blackmail. 58. The accused Naftali Shilo in the District Court of Appeals rejected the request to stay the proceedings until the appeal. And he found nothing wrong with the behavior of his blackmailing friends Gali Ron and Sanonit Porer. First reason for action – extortion activity 59. The plaintiff repeats and confirms all the above paragraphs as if they were fully detailed here. 60. The defendants invented an "extortion activity" that is evil, illegal and contrary to the laws of nations, with a specific focus on victims such as a male plaintiff, non-Israeli by origin and married or were married to Israeli women intending to extort them and rob them of everything they own, including the usurpation of paternity, and turning them into slaves for life God is an Israeli blackmail system. 61. As explained, the extortion is carried out taking advantage of the fact that the jurisdiction of the State of Israel can quickly become a death trap for any such targeted victim who dares to enter Israel to "protect" his rights in the notorious courts where every legal process is rigged in favor of women, with zero chance of obtaining a trace of due process or equal protection of the law. 62. There is not a single case in the entire corpus of cases in Israel that protects a person who comes to the hearing to participate in a trial or a hearing, from being unable to return to his home and loved ones overseas. and even leave Israel. 63. In fact, it is just as easy for a woman to win such fake claims (which in themselves are extortionist claims) by default, when all the women have to do is fill out a new page form and request the man be locked up in Israel under a non-exit order. 64. The US State Department is well aware of this judicial trap judge and extortionist and for many years it has issued a travel advisory to all American men considering traveling to Israel with fragile family relationships, to be aware of the risk that the US will not be able to help them if they end up trapped with no exit continue. See the US Department of Justice's travel advisory to Israel: 65. Beginning on May 10, 2020 and continuing into the foreseeable future, the defendants, who committed acts of extortion and illegal detention of his body as collateral (by holding the plaintiff as a hostage in Israel as part of a fake exit order) and subsequently blackmailing the plaintiff by demanding that he return to Israel, were committed jointly or separately against the plaintiff , or face a judgment in absentia, and if he returns he will risk a long loss of freedom of movement, and may never be able to go outside for the rest of his life. 66. In the last 25 years, these defendants and many other judges in Israel who followed the instructions of the radical feminist acts have carried out the same acts of blackmail in a systematic, calculated and malicious manner targeting approximately 2,000 foreign men married to Israeli women every year. 67. For example, in Haifa, Judge Hila Gurevich blackmailed Father Avraham Harsin that she would drop the case of the kidnapping of the minors in The Hague if he did not travel from Nebraska to Israel. While he was present at the hearing on July 21, 2021, no departure order was issued against him and he was required to post a NIS 190,000 bond ($55,000) to leave Israel. 68. In March 2022 after living in poverty for 8 months with no income and one suitcase he brought from Nebraska, he was so desperate to get his freedom that he ran through a life-threatening minefield into Jordan. The U.S. Embassy in Amman had notified in advance but refused to send any consul to review its procedure for capturing the Jordanian border guard. The Israeli government demanded his return to Israel, and the Jordanians complied, instead of taking him to an airport to return to the U.S. 69. The same thing happened to another gay father living in Miami. The lesbian mother who lives in Israel filed a defamation lawsuit in the Rishon Lezion Family Court. Judge Mirit Poulos allowed her to serve extra-territorial subpoenas to Miami via e-mail and in a 7-day notice demanded this father (who also has 2 Miami children) appear before her or risk a default judgment, knowing full well that the mother in Israel is eager to lock him up as a hostage as soon as he sets foot Briefing in Israel. 70. Another father who was tormented by Judge Ayelet Golan-Tabori also in the family court in Rishon Lezion managed to escape from Israel and save his life. He arrived in France and received refugee status. Judge Dolan Tabori threatened to give all the property he left behind to his wife if he did not return to Israel and denied him an application to participate via video. This case was decided on October 23, 2011, case 32520-09. 71. The fact that the same pattern existed already 11 years ago, and in this case where the judge refused to respect the 1951 UNHCR Refugee Convention by demanding the return of a refugee to the country that persecuted him, shows a pattern of extortion. It met the continuity requirement of H.J., Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 492 U.S. 229 (1989). 72. This pattern of continued extortion will continue in the future. There are no signs that any of the accused (especially Hayut who has the power to change all this) will suddenly change their allegiance to the cult of feminism. 73. These acts of extortion and extortion provide the interstate trade with a demand such as the targets, the plaintiff and fathers and other men similarly located outside the State of Israel but they are dragged into the quagmire and folly of the defendants and their tactics involuntarily and innocently, thereby affecting their property in Israel, and once a judgment is given against them Law of default, then the defendants use the international cooperation and multiple mutual recognition agreements to pursue them to their foreign address. 74. The defendants' calculated extortion pattern is based on the following Basic practices: 1. Basic actions based on § 1341 (relating to mail fraud) and § 1343 (relating to use of wires): The Mail Fraud and Fraud Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343) makes it a crime for anyone to use mail or wires to promote a scheme Defraud or extort. The fraudulent and/or blackmail statements themselves need not be transmitted by mail or wire; It is only required that a fraudulent scheme be promoted, concealed, or advanced by the U.S. mail or wires. 2. The defendants e-mailed the plaintiff the decisions that set the trap in Israel, threatening him that if he did not

will travel to Israel at the risk of being locked in the country indefinitely, his assets will be confiscated and transferred to his wife and sanctions can be imposed in favor of Israel from the Ministry of Finance. This provides for the use of mail and wires to carry out extortion. Furthermore, it was done in interstate or foreign commerce for the purpose of carrying out such an extortion scheme as to deprive the plaintiff and other similarly situated men (Americans and not Israelis) of the intangible right of honest services.

Basic actions based on section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice): Defendants, alone or in corrupt conspiracy, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, who attempted to influence, intimidate, or delay proceedings in the United States Court of Claims where the plaintiff is located claim to recover seized goods (by producing a judgment created by extortion in Israel that will collect on the proceeds of the litigation), and taking his personal property by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influenced, blocked or hindered, or tried to influence, block or delay the administration of justice.

Fundamental acts based on Article 1513 (relating to compensation for a witness, victim, or informant): Defendants knowingly engaged in behavior that is extortion by locking the plaintiff in Israel for 14 months, limiting his freedom and livelihood and after his departure threatening him that he must return to the rescue. Tested and risking another indefinite period limited by the state Rahav Niail, which caused physical injury to the plaintiff or damage to the plaintiff's tangible property, or threatened to do so, with the intention of retaliating against the plaintiff for his presence or testimony which Ofek requires him to give in person. Needless to say that after the corona, video testimony was available to all One who is a party or a witness, except for fathers and men in family courts.

Basic acts based on section 1951 (relating to interference with trade, robbery or extortion): the accused obstructed, delayed or affected, trade or movement of any article or commodity in trade,

by robbery (as defined as "the unlawful taking or obtaining of personal property, from the person or in the presence of another, against his will, by means of actual or threatened force, or violence, or fear of injury, immediate or future, to his body or property, or property in his possession or possession , or to the person or property of a relative or a member of his family or of any of his family members

company at the time of taking or obtaining) or extortion by threats (as defined: "Obtaining property from another, with his consent, as a result of wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence or fear, or under the guise of a proper official") or attempted or conspired to do so, or undertook or threatened Physical violence against the plaintiff or property in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything that violates 18 USC § 1951 by preventing the plaintiff from leaving Israel to complete transactions originating in China and intended

Redemption in the US, in Dallas and other US redemption points.

3. Fundamental acts based on section 1952 (relating to extortion); The defendants committed "illegal activity" as defined in 18 USC § 1952 (b)(2) including "extortion" in violation of state laws or US laws (which include the Constitution, due process, equal protection and international human rights treaties) in interstate or foreign commerce or through the mail or any facility in interstate or foreign commerce, with the intent to distribute the proceeds of the illegal activity (extortion of NIS 15,000,000) to Lipit or to commit any crime of violence in order to promote any illegal activity; otherwise promote, conduct , establish, continue or facilitate the promotion, establishment, management or administration of any illegal activity, and then commits or attempts to commit an act described above.
4. Due to the above, the defendants caused the plaintiff damages and losses due to the performance of one or more of the basic acts defined in 18 U.S.C §1961(1), (the definition of racketeering activity) and given that the plaintiff was the intended target of that defendant's behavior, he suffered damages and the plaintiff is entitled for a verdict in the amount of 15,000 NIS ($4,400,000) based on a false interpretation of the relationship relationship and the verdict
5. Pain, suffering and aggravation in the amount of $500,000 to cover 14 years of illegal nationwide confinement and failure to leave and humiliation of a victim of sex discrimination and a victim of extortion and torture.
6. The cumulative amount of damages is $8,576,000 against all defendants, jointly and severally, for compensatory damages.

A second reason for action

crimes against humanity

78. The plaintiff reiterates and confirms all the above paragraphs as if they were fully detailed here.
79. Defendants' conduct violated international standards of human rights, as incorporated in US courts through UN international treaties and conventions on human rights, equivalent to due process and equal protection) by causing discrimination on the basis of the plaintiff's gender as a man, and imprisoning him In Israel for 14 months without a home or the ability to work, they throw him out of his house, seize his car. Withholds his title to the land, denies all his complaints for relief, allows his ex-wife to extort him with a fake lawsuit, while applying judicial extortion by demanding astronomical ransom sums, and upon his departure blackmail him that if he does not return, everything he owns will be lost and he will lose all contact with the His 3 children forever.
80. These accused extortionists in black robes are applying "justice" under the teachings of the worst ultra-radical feminist ideologies no different than the racist "justice" of genocide meted out in Nazi Germany last century. The Nazis tormented and tortured to death Jews because they were Jews. The accused Israeli officials are doing the same thing, wreaking havoc on every male Jewish neighbor, just because he is a man.
81. The plaintiff has no chance of obtaining justice or avoiding the extortion ring because the defendants ensured that no targeted individual could escape their wrath anywhere in the world through a network of international reciprocity treaties.
82. The prosecutor and all those Jewish men who are in a similar situation (non-Israelis) can get justice and fairness from defendants like Swallow Forer in the same way that Anne Frank did an opportunity to petition Joseph Mengele on the ramps of Auschwitz to get a round trip ticket on the next train back to Amsterdam.
83. The defendants' behavior constitutes a crime against humanity and the commission of a modern holocaust in the name of the cult of "feminism". They knowingly, willfully and maliciously violated the laws of all nations and jus cogens. Their conduct was scandalous, shocking, repulsive and abominable.
84. The plaintiff may

​​ Apply the Tort Claims Act and the TVPA (Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000).

85. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to a judgment for his damages in the amount of $8,576,000.

A third cause of action

Negligence against one another

86. The defendant Nefesh BaNefesh invests hundreds of millions of dollars every year. Campaigns to entice Jews from Anglo-speaking countries to immigrate to Israel. They represent Israel as a modern, vibrant, friendly and democratic country.
87. Their clients are not informed about the true nature of the target "Israel" an evil, cruel, violent and corrupt country with a corrupt legal system that did not follow any international standards and deprives men of everything they own, the moment the woman wants to "throw away" the man (just like garbage) when the divorce starting
88. The defendant was negligent in failing to provide such disclosures. On the true face of Israel.
89. Had it been found out, the plaintiff would never have married an Israeli woman, would never immigrate to Israel and would never voluntarily put himself directly into the "mouth of the beast" that wants to eat him alive.
90. The defendant Nefesh b'Nefesh materially deviated from the standard of professionalism among immigration and relocation marketers.
91. But for the defendant's negligence and misrepresentations, the plaintiff would not have suffered damages in the amount of 8.5 million dollars.
92. But for the defendant's negligence and misrepresentations, the plaintiff would not have suffered damages in the amount of 8.5 million dollars.
93. Kadri and her Rakman Center strongly believe and widely support the idea that women should never pay child support, should always be exempt from prosecution for filing false police complaints, and that custody should always be with the mother with full veto powers to block and filter the husband's level of contact with their children
94. Kadri and her Rakman Center strongly believe and widely advocate the sanctity of the Ketubah, a religious tool by which a man buys the woman's sexual services in the celebration of divorce. They present all women as sex slaves sold to the highest bidder at the written price, which can range from tens of thousands of dollars to hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Kadri and her Rakman Center strongly believe and widely support an advertising campaign like the following, which depicts women in military commando gear against men:

95. Kadri and her Rakman Center misrepresent to the Jewish Federations in the USA that women have no rights in Israel, that women are killed by Jewish husbands every day, left and right, that Israel is a dangerous place for women to live, and that with divorce women are the ones who are discriminated against and that the women lose Property and rights, when the truth is exactly opposite.
96. The financial vehicle that sends donations from Jewish communities in the USA is the American Friends of Bar Ilan located in New York and 4 other centers in the USA. They are appointed by the false statements of the accused Kadri.
97. In this campaign the mothers are dressed in military commando outfits as if they are at war with men, and the slogan is "Come to us, let us fight for you to get you the child support you deserve".

See the official poster and flyer: 111. See also the video clip broadcast on television as uploaded by the employer, this is visual proof that the Israeli defendants have declared war on Jewish men in Israel. However, explicit acknowledgments in writing and in English can be found in the Israeli periodic reports to the UN committees on civil and political issues. Rights of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Already in 2011, the last committee warned Israel for not meeting the requirements of international laws and standards by granting automatic custody to women, exempting women from child support and imposing a huge burden on men, and not taking measures to prevent more than 200 cases of suicide by men in divorce or divorce proceedings .

98. The rules of this war (Jus ad Bellum), which the accused Kadri is feeding all the elements of Israeli society, in a nutshell are: only the man pays child support. A woman should never pay child support because she belongs to a sex boss, no matter how rich she is. A man has to pay full child support even if he is the guardian of the children and the woman travels the world to pursue her strict sex. A man also has to pay a third of the woman's rent and rent and maintenance wherever she chooses as "child support". A man is also expected to pay "care fees" when the woman needs a babysitter.

Only the man pays the transportation costs of visits and gas. The alimony never stops, even if the man is sick, disabled, PTSD veteran, in bankruptcy, in prison, in a hospital, in a mental institution, suffering from terminal cancer, about to die or incapacitated, the child support never stops. The woman can also sue the man's parents if he is unable to pay her in full or in part.

99. Additional rules of war are: child support does not depend on a person's income, and income has nothing to do with child support. In fact, there is no problem imposing child support that exceeds the income, even two or three times the income. Alimony starts at a fixed amount of NIS 1,400 per child (not including school fees, including private schools and kindergartens, and 50% of unusual expenses such as medical and dental that are not covered by insurance, etc.) All extras amount to approximately NIS 2,200-2,500 ( 600-675 NIS per child. Unlike other countries where the amount increases moderately with additional children, the fee is fixed and doubled for the child.
100. This is in a country where 50% of the population earns a minimum wage of 5,500 NIS (about $1,500), and it is not possible to rent a studio for less than 2,500 NIS ($675), and the minimal associated expenses (city tax, common building fees, electricity, water and gas) are at least another NIS 1,000 ($270).
101. Suppose a man earns 5,500 NIS ($1,500) and has 3 children, he will have to pay at least 7,500 NIS ($2,020) in child support. Where will that person live and how will he be able to meet the shortfall of $520? Some judges in Israel were not ashamed to tell the men in the courtroom "start selling a kidney".
102. The situation in the enforcement and collection authority where the accused Dikla Klein can be described as a perpetrator only. A woman is allowed to open a collection case even if she owes $0. She can issue a restraining order immediately, thus using a man's body as collateral for "future child support." Also, my classes immediately start piling up Interest compound interest along with cost of living adjustments so the child support base will always go up faster than anyone can imagine. Not long after, all pension funds are liquidated, all bank accounts are seized, credit cards are banned, driver's license is not renewed, and then comes the mandatory 21 days in jail, every time the wife wants to abuse her ex-husband a little more.
103. The defendant Kadri is responsible for all this extortion, mass torture of men and mass robbery of men, by taking donations from gullible American donors and spending their money to create hell for Jewish men in Israel.
104. It is estimated that Kadri and her Rakman Center are responsible for the deaths of 300-500 men each year (by suicide or otherwise) due to hate propaganda emanating from her campaigns. It can only be compared to Nazi propaganda that painted Jews as rats in the sewer.
105. The actions and travels of the accused Kadri were intended and intended against the plaintiff and men similarly situated, and indeed it succeeded in causing the plaintiff the damages described above.
106. As a proximate result of one or more of these intentional acts or omissions, the plaintiff suffered $8.5 million. Therefore, due to the above, the defendants caused injuries to the plaintiff and damages due to the performance of one or more of the basic acts defined by 18 U.S.C §1961(1), (definition of extortion activity) and given that the plaintiff was the intended target of that defendant's behavior, he suffered damages and the plaintiff is entitled For a judgment in the amount of (a) 15,000,000 NIS ($4,400,000) based on a false interpretation of the marital contact ($3,000,000) in "child support" pain, suffering and aggravation in the amount of 500,000 dollars to cover 14 months of illegal locking in the entire country in and without leaving and the humiliation of being a victim For discrimination on the basis of sex that was filed in Israel in the fake lawsuit and to fight with no way out, the cumulative amount of the damages is $8,576,000 against all the defendants, $6,000,000 in punitive damages for a total of $14,576,000 together and separately, for compensatory damages, plus costs and payments.
107. The applicant demands that an arrest warrant be issued against the defendants to ensure their arrival at the hearings since they refuse to accept surrenders and to order surrenders to be produced by a federal policeman, a Palestinian policeman, and through the Commissioner of the Kobi Israel Police Shabtai. .
108. The applicant is homeless and lives on the street and requests an exemption from the fee, as well as a refugee permit to attend the hearing.

Since the defendants imprisoned the plaintiff without being able to leave.

Date: Allen, Texas

July 25, 2024

Yaakov Ben Issachar, the prosecutor Pro

Dew. 972-4359933

Email: [email protected]

To:

Gali Ron Weizman 1 Tel Aviv Israel.

Naftali Shilo, 562 Hagfen St., Efrata, West Bank, Israel 9044613

Nefesh B'Nefesh, 7800 Northaven Rd, Dallas, TX 75230, USA Phone, 1-214-369-3313

Gideon Sa'ar, 29 Tzel A Din St., Jerusalem Israel

Esther Hayut, 23 Yonatan St., Tzalah, Tel Aviv Israel.

Ruth Halperin Kaddari, 60 East 56th Street, New York, NY 10022, Tel 1-212-906-3900

Livnat Melamed Henrietta Sold 1 Tel Aviv

Swallow Porer Weizman 1 Tel Aviv

Avri Suton Bialik 35 Ramat Gan

Liat Shapira Bialik 35 Tel Aviv

Dikla Klein Weizman 1 Tel Aviv.

לא מובן איך למדו באוניברסיטה.?

התביעה התקדימית שהוגשה בה גם צווי מעצר לעובד הסעד אברי סוטון אשר בעד שימוש בסמים וניכור הורי כאשר מדובר בחברתו לעירייה  הגברת לבנה עבאדי .

התביעה מפרטת גנוסייד נגד אבות ,וחיסול גברים בצורה שיטתית .

התביעה הוגשה נגד מיישמי הגנוסיד השופט המתנחל נפתלי שילה ,סנונית פורר ,לבנת מלמד אשר עוסקת בתפירת תיקים לגברים .

מדינת ישראל היא מדינת גנוסייד ויש להטיל עליה סנקציות ונגד ראשי הגנוסייד ברווחה ,ובבתי המשפט .